CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] which contests would require me to sign AA7XT/0

To: William Hein <bill.aa7xt@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] which contests would require me to sign AA7XT/0
From: iain macdonnell - N6ML <ar@dseven.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 09:38:38 -0800
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Generally, in any contest where the call area counts as a multiplier,
it seems to make sense that you should use the suffix. The WAEDC rules
don't seem to explicitly require this, though, which I find a bit odd,
personally....

73,

    ~iain / N6ML


On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 7:04 AM, William Hein <bill.aa7xt@gmail.com> wrote:
> When I first lived in Colorado, in the '90s, I had the call AA6TT.  As a
> rule I did not sign "AA6TT/0" since this was my permanent station location,
> I wasn't portable.  In CQ WW contests however I did sign /0 as I recall the
> rules required me to do so.
>
> I'm now back living and hamming in Colorado with a non-zero call AA7XT
> (long story).  I checked CQ WW rules today to see if would have to sign /0
> in that contest and I didn't see any rules concerning portable calls.  Did
> CQ drop this rule?
>
> Are there any contests that will require me to sign /0?
>
> 73
> Bill AA7XT
> Glade Park CO
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>