CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Flashback - Is It Time?

To: "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Flashback - Is It Time?
From: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 23:11:44 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
What if it were "choose your starting time; count the next 24 hours of
operating time":  twenty-four contiguous operating hours (with the clock
stopping if the operator takes a break >30 minutes), rather than 24
clock-hours after the selected start time.

It removes the problem of letting 48-hour participants pick and choose
their best, potentially non-contiguous 24 hours, it avoids the issue of
making it just an iron-butt half-contest, and leaves us with a side-event
for folks who like to sleep at night and/or have honey-dos that need to be
honey-done.

-- 
*Michael D. Adams* (N1EN)
Poquonock, Connecticut | mda@n1en.org


On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:28 PM, David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>wrote:

> Nobody gains anything by requiring that the 24 hours be contiguous, and
> certainly not the folks who prefer to tough it out for the full 48 hours.
>
>
> On 4/3/2013 1:28 PM, Steve London wrote:
>
>> Just let the operator choose any starting time. From that point, they can
>> operate for the next 24 hours, should they decide to be even do that much.
>>
>> 73,
>> Steve, N2IC
>>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>