Gee Rick... You don’t have to insult someone's intelligence just because they
don’t agree with your point of view. I have done contests from many big
contest stations (including yours) and at my small station since 1976 so I
comprehend everything about contesting and what it takes to win.
BTW I operated WPX SSB MM at K8CC several times in the 1990’s and we beat
several east coast stations (and won) that category from Michigan. I don’t hear
K3LR (who is almost in Ohio) and N5AU , who both beat the east coast MM’s
before complaining about the rules like you regularly do. Maybe you should just
look at it as a challenge and maybe someday you will get some propagation that
will give you some type of an advantage.
Jeff KU8E
From: Rick Dougherty
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 5:38 AM
To: Jeff Clarke
Cc: CQ Contest
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Is the wpx a prefix test or dx contest?
To say it is an apples to orange comparison, is to say you do not comprehend
what the topic of conversation has been.
When a fully staffed M-M team has to make 2400 additional qso's to make the
same score as a M-S team that is not any band full time, is
what I am talking about. The WPX contest has the geographical advantage because
of the low band point system that awards a huge advantage
to any New England station.
Yes it is true that the NQ4I team has won a number of previous WPX
contests.....but with that in mind, there was no legit competition from New
England. Had KC1XX operated in this contest, he would, on a bad day make 30%
more qso's than NQ4I and on a good day 80-100% more qsos. These qsos coming
from two areas...the low bands and the high bands where he has a tremendous
advantage to hear and work stations that will never be heard or worked at the
next propagation hop.
My proposal for the point scoring of 3 points per qso regardless makes the
contest truer to its stated objective and removes the geographical advantage.
For any M-M there are only so many finite contacts possible. KU8E would have us
believe that there is a wealth of stateside stations that could be worked thus
creating a super inflated score for the NQ4I team. Not true. The qsos made
would not improve, because
there are not additional qso's to be made. The well is already dry.
So we are back to the low band point system that awards more points for
stations that have geographical nearness and penalizes those that do not.
Suffice it to say, K1LZ and his team are not dumb....they know that to make a
winning score they need to make as many 6 point qso's as possible...the NQ4I
team likewise knows the point breakdown and the need for 6 point qso's....K1LZ
spends only a few hours on 80m...NQ4I has
2 full time ops and maintains a strong presence on the band both cq'ing and S &
P'ing and cannot begin to work as many qso's as the brief foray on the band of
K1LZ.
To carry the score extrapolation a little further out. in this example, it
takes the NQ4I team 2400 qso's to equal K1LZ's score...had KC1XX been on, the
score differential would be an additional 3000 qso's deficit for the NQ4I team
to over come. In other words for the NQ4I team to equal the
score differential from a KC1XX competitor, some thing around 5400 qsos would
make the scores comparable, nearly twice as many qso's.
If we consider KC1XX makes the exact number of qso's as NQ4I ( and we assume he
maintains 3.17 qso points ratio as K1LZ) we have:
7077 qso's 1450 prefixes = 32.6 million points
applying 3 points per qso we have
7077 qso's 1450 prefixes = 30.7 Mil
The scores are equal because the same number of qso's were made, and to clinch
the win, one of the two teams needs to work another prefix, not another low
band contact where advantage exists now.
KU8e would have us believe that NQ4I is hoarding stateside qso's and if the
rules change to 3 points per contact, then NQ4I will have a tremendous
advantage. I say make the contest true to it's stated objective....a prefix
contest...plain and simple. The winner is determined by who works the most
qso's and prefixes...not who has the best geographical advantage with an
outdated and biased point system.
de NQ4I
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Jeff Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Why this is a big deal?? Comparing a M/S score to a M/M score is like
comparing apples to oranges. It’s ridiculous to consider giving 3 points for
domestic QSO’s in this contest. I live in GA – probably 75 miles from NQ4I and
we would have a HUGE advantage vs. the East Coast on 20 and 40 meters because
of our skip zone to the highly populated USA call areas. Be thankful that the
rules were changed to give points for W/K QSO’s to make the contest more fun or
the difference in scores would be even greater. It used to be ZERO points. Plus
NQ4I has won M/M several times so I don’t understand why he has a beef against
the rules.
Maybe give some credit to Krassy and his team for a great score. K1LZ has
consistently put in some great scores in M/S that have beat some of the top
contenders in M2X in several contests.
Jeff KU8E
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|