any dogs on the property??
mike w7dra
a couple of CQWWs ago i had the long arm of the law out, some neighbor
noticed me putting down my "portable beverage" down the street at 11pm
and the police followed it right to my cabin in the woods......
mike w7dra
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 19:34:32 -0000 "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net> writes:
> The proposal is STUPID
>
> Nr 1 I might change my mind at the last instant as to class I
> operate.
> This last WPX I had planned to do SOLP single band, After a few
> minutes
> of the excellent band condx I decide to go to high power and all
> bands.
>
> I know that my score isn't going to be one of the BIG BIG ones but
> I don't
> want to loose the 10 to 50 or so Q's that some OFFICAL CQ
> inspector is
> going to cost me and to get in he has to climb over a gate with barb
> wire on
> the top and walk 1/4 mile to the house. Or I guess he could call
> and make
> an appointment .
>
> Rex K7QQ
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On
> Behalf Of
> Albert Crespo
> Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2013 1:15 PM
> To: Martin Durham; cq-contest@contesting.com; k5zd@charter.net
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Preview Draft of 2013 CQ WW Contest Rules
>
> Good idea, but not reasonably possible to execute.
> Is CQ going to set-up a cut off date that you need to notify them
> of your
> operating intentions? If not, is someone from CQ with a "stinking
> badge"
> going to pound unannounced on someone's door and demand entrance any
> time
> that is convenient to CQ to inspect what is going on?
> What if someone had planned to do a two transmitter multi effort,
> but it
> is learned that only three people can show up during the contest
> weekend
> at different times,and you would rather do a Multi-single,.
> Would that change be allowed?
> Or, if you had had planned to operate as SOAB HP and you amplifier
> dies
> just before the contest, you are now precluded from operating as
> SOAB low
> power?
> This proposal does nothing to stomp out the gross cheaters that
> are now
> prevalent in radio sport contesting.
> Most of these clowns are not in areas that are easy to access and
> are there
> for that reason.
> Is CQ going to send people to zones 9, 33 and 35 to monitor
> operating?
> CQ in the past few years has stepped up it's efforts to
> investigate
> multiple signals and other dubious practices to insure the cheaters
> do not
> have it so easy.
> This proposal as written, will cause a lot of problems for the
> honest
> operators and needs to be withdrawn as submitted.
>
> From: "Martin Durham" <w1md@cfl.rr.com>
> To: k5zd@charter.net; "'Contest Reflector'"
> <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
> Sent: 02/06/2013 01:42:43
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Preview Draft of 2013 CQ WW Contest Rules
> >Section VIII
> >
> >14. A competitor who wishes to be judged for a top score in their
> >category must agree to being visited at any time during the contest
> by
> >an observer appointed by the CQ WW DX Contest Committee.
> >Failure to respond to the Committee request or to allow a Committee
>
> >appointed observer full access to the operating location during the
>
> >contest period may result in the competitor being removed from
> award
> >eligibility for 3 years.
> >
> >SO...will there now be a 'sign up' sheet on the CQWW site to sign
> >'advanced notice' of your operating intentions? This would be a
> >requirement in order to be able to schedule a visit to the
> competitors
> >site.
> >
> >And, is this for Single OP only or Mulit-OP as well?
> >
> >73,
> >W1MD
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On
> Behalf
> >Of Randy Thompson K5ZD
> >Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:01 PM
> >To: Contest Reflector
> >Subject: [CQ-Contest] Preview Draft of 2013 CQ WW Contest Rules
> >
> >The CQ WW DX Contest Committee has conducted a complete review of
> the
> >CQ WW Contest rules for 2013. We ask all contesters to read the new
>
> >rules and let us know if you have questions or comments. We will
> use
> >this feedback to improve the words or to add to the frequently
> asked
> >questions on the web site.
> >
> >
> >
> >View a draft of proposed rules here. http://cqww.com/blog/?p=135
> >
> >
> >
> >The review period closes on June 25, 2013. The official rules for
> CQ WW
> >DX
> >Contest 2013 will be announced by July 2, 2013.
> >
> >
> >
> >Looking forward to your feedback.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Randy Thompson, K5ZD
> >Director - CQ WW DX Contest
> >
> >email: k5zd@cqww.com
> >web: <http://www.cqww.com/> www.cqww.com
> >
> >Facebook: <http://www.facebook.com/cqwwdx> www.facebook.com/cqwwdx
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >CQ-Contest mailing list
> >CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> >http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >CQ-Contest mailing list
> >CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> >http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> BlackBerry® 10
> Find out more about the new BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
>
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/51ab9e47736981e4548aest04duc
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|