Me too - another casual contester.
A simple enhancement of the logging program(s) you use might help a lot
with those serious operators' problem. Suppose you could have a command to
tell your logger "treat this call as if I worked it", so it would never
appear again as a spot on your screen.
In N1MM, for example, there is a "remove selected spot" menu item now to
get rid of a spot on the bandmap. A similar item "Remove selected spot and
never consider that callsign again" would stop the "over and over and over
again" problem.
The loggers could even have a file, similar to the ones we use today as a
"whitelist" of known contest calls, but containing a "blacklist" of known
bad calls. The loggers would simply read such a file and then ignore any
spots for those calls.
It's good to always improve the accuracy of the data feed, but there are
other techniques that might be very helpful too...
73,
/Jack de K3FIV
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 5:10 AM, Bob Naumann <W5OV@w5ov.com> wrote:
>
> For the more "casual" contest operator (of which I'm one - most of the
> time), and for the day-to-day DXer, the errors admittedly don't present
> much
> of a problem.
>
> The problem comes in a major DX contest, when you're a serious operator,
> and
> during the last 24 to 36 hours of the contest you've already worked most
> everything that is unique (multiplier-wise) on the band(s). As a result,
> your logging program is no longer alerting you to the stuff you've already
> worked (the real callsigns). Guess what you do see? A preponderance of
> RBN
> errors! It has been at a level that is simply unacceptable. Most of these
> are not "off by one" errors either. The real problem is that they never
> stop. The same errors are propagated over and over and over and over again.
> It becomes quite unsettling after a while. "When will this stop?"
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|