CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Ethics of operating overtime in SS

To: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Ethics of operating overtime in SS
From: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 17:03:51 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 04:52:35PM -0600, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote:
> The rules are pretty clear.  Apparently what they are doing wit the logs 
> is contrary to the rules.  Maybe the rules should be more clearly 
> written.  Why have rules that you don't enforce?
> 
> It is pretty clear that the rules say to operate 24 of the 30. They do 
> not say if you operate more than 24 hours your score will be determined 
> by the first 24 hours of operation.
> 
> So what is it ARRL?

Huh?

I think the log checking is enforcing the 24 hour time limit just fine.

How else should they handle a log that is over time?

DQ the entrant?  

The rule sets a time limit to the operating period.

If someone operates more than the 1440 minutes of on time then
it makes sense to me to enforce it just as they do - by removing 
all the points that are made after 1440 minutes of on time. 

It is not to your advantage to operate more that 1440 minutes and as far
as I can tell it harms no one.

> >
> >2.4. All entries may operate no more than 24 of the 30 hours.
> >2.5. Off periods may not be less than 30 minutes in length.
> >2.6. Times off and on must be clearly noted in paper logs. In
> >electronically-submitted Cabrillo logs, off-times are calculated by the
> >log-checking software.
> >2.7. Listening time counts as operating time.


-- 
George Fremin III - K5TR
geoiii@kkn.net
http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>