CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Scoring System needs revision?

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Scoring System needs revision?
From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 09:01:07 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I don't think this is a surprise but the USA map is a fairly decent representation of the population of the USA.

It makes sense that where there are more people you would have more hams or have hams have moved to the east coast to work more DX?

Is the EU map representative of the population as a whole there too? It seems that central EU is far more heavily populated than western EU at least with hams who operate CQ WW. Is there more population in these areas too?

The feeling I get from most people is that they are happy with the rules they way they are. Some of the more vocal people other than myself are East coasters who do quite well every contest so those folks might have a bit of bias.

I hope the main goal of contesting is to have fun. Here in Colorado we had the slim chances to win when the propagation was perfect. So going in we knew we pretty much had no chance to win it all. Which says to me the premise of the contest and scoring is wrong. With all things considered operator skill should be the main factor in winning not geographical location.

Mike W0MU

On 12/2/2013 10:03 PM, Rick Kiessig wrote:
For those who may not have looked at the geographical disparities in CQWW,
you may want to check out the maps at the links below:

World:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/48950365/cqww-cw-world-2012.PNG

Europe:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/48950365/cqww-cw-eu-2012.PNG

US:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/48950365/cqww-cw-us-2012.PNG

I generated these by geolocating all of the calls that submitted logs in
CQWW CW 2012 (this year's aren't available yet). The dot sizes are
proportional to the number of calls that resolved to the same latitude /
longitude. I did the same thing for CQWW SSB, with similar results.

If you live in the Eastern US, or in the middle of EU, or right next to a
zone or continent boundary, then obviously you have a vested interest in
keeping the existing scoring system.

If the contest goals include attracting more DX to the competition and
making scores more comparable globally, then I think it's obvious that
scoring needs to be different.

However, from much of the discussion I've seen so far, it seems like the
opposite is true; perhaps the real goal is discouraging DX from the
competition (as in having any real chance of winning), to have it be mainly
a US/EU thing. That's certainly the vibe I'm getting.

73, Rick ZL2HAM / ZM1G


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>