Charly, why are you so quick todismiss the idea of a web-based,
advertiser-supported magazine? It requires more than QST's images of
the paper magazine, but as someone suggested a few weeks ago, there
*are* successful hobby magazines on the web. Of course, some people
will always seek out "echo chambers" that reinforce their own views, but
quality still has a chance.
73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
http://reversebeacon.net,
blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
For spots, please go to your favorite
ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.
On 2/1/2014 10:02 AM, Charles Harpole wrote:
I am happy, like everyone, to see that CQ style contests may continue.
Congrats to the heavy hitters listed on the web site.
BUT, more is lost with the demise of CQ Magazine than contesting:
-alternative voice and view to QST.... just like the TWO newspapers in
cities of old, ham radio benefits from multiple voices... none of which
need be distinctively contending but plurality of ideas, contra web site
censorship, is good for the health of the hobby.
-cohesion and shared experiences and purposes... A group holds together via
shared experiences (the way squads of soldiers are trained) and shared
solving of troubles. A real tangible magazine can help lots. A real
magazine is under pressure to offer good, useful, entertaining and
promotional articles; its goal is to include ideas, not exclude, and sell
to a broad readership. That is not so true of narrow-topic and closely
censored web sites which live by servicing only those IN the IN group. A
system that avoids lively debate and diversity will die.
I feel so sorry for those writing here who don't see the value of
continuing these services and simply wish to discard anything the market is
too weak to fully support. I see no other substitute that will come onto
the Web; instead there will be even more insular sites, happily
reinforcing each others' opinions while condemning and excluding any
reasoned alternatives.
A civilized society subsidizes the arts, for example, for good reasons. I
see only good resulting from a subsidized CQ Magazine to help keep vibrant
life in this aging hobby.
73,
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|