Hi Bob,
0.3% error rate in reports/exchanges sounds a bit high in a contest where just
CQ zones are exchanged. On the contrary in a contest with serial numbers like
WPX I would rate 0.3% error rate in exchanges as being quite good! ;-)
Here are my details if you want to compare (SOSB10):
2232 Claimed QSO before checking (does not include duplicates)
13 (0.6%) calls copied incorrectly
1 (0.0%) exchanges copied incorrectly
73, Olli - DH8BQA
--
Contest, DX & radio projects: http://www.dh8bqa.de
Am 12.04.2014 11:10, schrieb Bob Kupps:
Hi I just received my logging error report for the CQ SSB. I am not interested
in an accuracy sub-competition as recently discussed but would like to know how
I am doing relative to the top stations.
My copy error rate was 0.6 % for calls and 0.3% for reports in 1456 logged Qs. I know we
can always try to improve our copying proficiency but it would be interesting to know
what a realistic target might be, so I would like them to be published for that reason. I
notice the WAE publishes a "% penalty applied" to the top ten stations, but
there is no detail like the CQ report.
73 Bob HS0ZIA
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|