CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments / FAQs on WRTC2018 qualification rules

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments / FAQs on WRTC2018 qualification rules
From: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 07:22:13 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
OK,fine.

2011 (ssb):

NN3W - 11,828,236
K1DG - 9,459,060

Note that K1DG is closer to Europe than I was...

73 Rich NN3W

On 12/11/2014 11:57 PM, Milt -- N5IA wrote:
HMMMMMMM.  I wonder where K4XS is located?

N2IC is located just 60.66 miles from AZ and Zone 3; the FAR, FAR west of Zone 4, and only 320.46 miles from the nearest waters of the Pacific Ocean (Gulf of California).

If K4XS is in Florida, as his QRZ address says he is, then his station is ONE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED and FORTY miles to the east of N2IC, in the eastern southeastern portion of Zone 3.

I find this 'comparison' to NOT be a good comparison.  YMMV.

73 de Milt, N5IA


-----Original Message----- From: K4XS via CQ-Contest
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 5:30 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments / FAQs on WRTC2018 qualification rules

Here's one for you:

2013 CQWW SSB

K4XS SOAB Assisted:  10218476
N2IC  SOAB:  7528827

K4XS




In a message dated 12/8/2014 9:33:00 P.M. Coordinated Universal Time,
vk4ts@outlook.com writes:

"I still  find it odd in many years I cannot recall an assisted score
beating
unassisted in a major contest. (CQWW CQWPX) "

Should say TOP  score assisted beating TOP score unassisted


-----Original  Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
VK4TS Trent Sampson
Sent: Tuesday, 9 December 2014 6:56  AM
To: 'Paul O'Kane'; cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments / FAQs on WRTC2018 qualification rules

Do you run the risk of having participation certificates when there are too
many  categories ?

Does that really find the best contesters ?   Personally I don't like
cluster
use (old school) but if the rules to qualify are such then maybe I need to
re-address my stance if I want to  qualify.

I still find it odd in many years I cannot recall an assisted score beating
unassisted in a major contest. (CQWW  CQWPX)



-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest  [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Paul  O'Kane
Sent: Tuesday, 9 December 2014 5:21 AM
To:  cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments / FAQs on WRTC2018 qualification rules

On 08/12/2014 16:40, Yuri  wrote:

Putting this usually endless and useless assisted/unassisted and
single-op/multi-op discussion behind for  now,

If they're so useless, why then does CQ recognise the value of having
separate categories.  It's worth taking a look  at
http://www.cqww.com/raw.htm?mode=cw - showing the calculated raw scores for
CQWW CW 2014.

There are 46 categories listed, and that's without  including the Classic
and
Rookie sub-categories. Is anyone  complaining?

There are many reasons why CQWW is the world's most  popular contest, and
the
number of categories is one of them.

This "useless discussion" is unlikely to go away, and it would be helpful
if
the  WRTC2018 Committee members reconsidered their unanimous decision  to
eliminate unassisted categories.
They might all be  mistaken.

73,
Paul  EI5DI






_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest  mailing  list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest  mailing  list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest  mailing  list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.5577 / Virus Database: 4235/8718 - Release Date: 12/11/14


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.5577 / Virus Database: 4235/8718 - Release Date: 12/11/14

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>