CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting without spotting

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting without spotting
From: Tod Olson <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 09:55:55 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I don¹t really need to add to this thread, Steve, N2IC, said it all. Not
sure if anyone will modify their behavior though.


In the recent local letters to the editor [Idaho Falls Post Register] there
was included one recently with a statement destined for posterity:

³ ,,,,,, I don¹t care WHAT you say or write, I know what I want to believe !
?."

Tod, K0TO,

On 12/12/14, 1:34 PM, "Steve London" <n2icarrl@gmail.com> wrote:

> As someone who operates unassisted almost 100% of the time from home, it
> is unusual that I get clobbered by a "packet pileup" in the manner that
> Tom describes. Almost always, by the time I find someone good on the S&P
> radio, the assisted folks have already worked him/her. If I stumble
> across a pileup, and K3LR/W3LPL/K9CT/etc. is in the pileup, that one
> goes into the bandmap, and I return 10 minutes later. This is all part
> of my strategy, as someone who neither lives on the east coast, nor has
> more than a single medium-size monobander on any band.
> 
> 73,
> Steve, N2IC
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>