CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] The"highandmighty"syndrome on display

To: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] The"highandmighty"syndrome on display
From: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 21:13:09 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I'm going to start signing K0HB/QRQ.  Or maybe K0HB/QRO.

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 4:59 PM, null <steve.root@culligan4water.com>
wrote:

> I'm sure the majority of us at some time have slowed down, told somebody our 
> name, etc. in the middle of a contest. Particularly on phone it's worth 
> taking the time. A big score means you worked a lot of casual operators. For 
> all you know there are 20 casual guys listening to you and if they decide 
> you're a nice guy that my result in another 20 QSOs in your log. 
> On the other hand, there's nothing wrong with pointing out to someone how 
> they could improve their operating.
> And as far as QRP goes, only the "Stew" gets it right. The heavy lifting is 
> being done by the guy on the receiving end. How much skill does it take to 
> have a weak signal? 
> 73 SR
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hank Greeb [mailto:n8xx@arrl.org]
> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 03:57 PM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] The "high and mighty" syndrome on display
> I've recently viewed a super display here in the forum of the "high and 
> mighty syndrome" of a "self professed 'elite' contest operator" who showed, 
> without a doubt, disdain for a "lower class, worthless QRP bum" who is trying 
> to learn how to work in a contest.Note: I've been doing "CQ CENT" or CQ ARRL 
> Centennial (on voice). Yesterday I ran across a fellow who called me three 
> times "N8XX N8XX N8XX de WB5zzz WB5zzz WB5zzz" at about 14 WPM. I slowed down 
> to 14 WPM, gave him my "5NN PSM" to which he replied with his QTH, (Send in 
> duplicate) his name (sent in duplicate) and then "N8XX de WB5zzz KN" I 
> replied with WB5zzz N8XX TU NAME 73. He came back, asked for my name and QTH, 
> and I gave these to him and closed with 73 de n8xx CENT" All at 14 WPM. I did 
> speed up the "N8XX CENT" and he came back with "TU 73" This took perhaps 3 to 
> 4 minutes. No, it wasn't a blood and guts contest, but I figure he probably 
> went away with a good feeling. I've been asked in a contest for Name and QTH,
>   and I always responds with name and QTH. I figure that missing one, two, 
> three, or more contacts is worth encouraging the newbie to keep trying.Why so 
> many "self profession elitists" in the contest community? I certainly don't 
> understand it. I had to learn how to operate in a contest, and I assume that 
> anyone who dips his/her toes into a contest deserves respect and 
> encouragement.And, if I choose to run 0.1 watt or 1.5 KW, it's my 
> choice.72/73 de n8xx HgQRP >99.44% of the 
> time_______________________________________________CQ-Contest mailing 
> listCQ-Contest@contesting.comhttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>