To: | "'Kelly Taylor'" <ve4xt@mymts.net>, <w1ve@yccc.org>, "'Art Boyars'" <artboyars@gmail.com>, "'George via CQ-Contest'" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Another question about remote DX-peditions |
From: | "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net> |
Date: | Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:11:45 -0800 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Hi Kelly, ARRL General Rule 3.3 also refers to a "given location." I would argue that the "given location" is the place of the origin of the RF transmission. If you are operating two stations at different QTHs, the RF originates from two different places and the operator is not using more than one call sign from that "given location." Therefore, the operator would not be in violation of that rule. 73, Ken, K6LA / VY2TT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Another question about remote DX-peditions, Gerry Hull |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Announcing the North America SSB Sprint-boycott from "MAR", Mike & Coreen Smith VE9AA |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Another question about remote DX-peditions, Gerry Hull |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] QRP 160M WAS -- Need VT, CT, SC, WV, MS, KY, Jim Brown |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |