CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Mailing Certificates

To: k5zd@charter.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Mailing Certificates
From: "Fabio IZ4AFW / NZ1W" <iz4afw@iz4afw.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 09:25:56 +0100
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hi guys,
   I still see only the Raw scores for 2014 CQWW (SSB+CW) on the website,
so no certs available.
Am I missing something?

Thanks,
 Fabio
  IZ4AFW / IO4W / NZ1W

2015-02-02 4:39 GMT+01:00 Randy Thompson K5ZD <k5zd@charter.net>:

> Nothing wrong with certificates.  And nothing like having the first few
> show
> up in the mail!  I think it is wonderful that CQ and ARRL still take the
> time and effort to send paper certs.
>
> That said, one of the biggest expenses of running a contest is the printing
> and mailing of certificates.  For that reason, the Cabrillo log format
> recently had a new field added.
>
> From: http://wwrof.org/cabrillo/cabrillo-specification-v3/
>
> CERTIFICATE: YES | NO
> Indicate if you wish to receive, if eligible, a paper certificate sent via
> postal mail by the contest sponsor. The contest sponsor may or may not
> honor
> this tag, and if so may or may not use opt-in or opt-out as the default.
> YES
> is the default.
>
>
> If you don't want to receive certificates, simply add the line
> CERTIFICATE: NO
> to your log.
>
> Not all contests may support this flag yet (CQ WW does), but it will at
> least alert the sponsor as to your preference.
>
> Randy, K5ZD
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> > Pete Smith N4ZR
> > Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2015 4:17 PM
> > To: CQ Contest
> > Subject: [CQ-Contest] Mailing Certificates
> >
> > Yesterday, I downloaded and printed my certificate from CQWWCW 2014.
> > The resulting piece of paper is every bit as nice as the ones they used
> > to mail.
> >
> > Why is the ARRL still spending lots of person-hours, printing costs and
> > postage to mail out certificates for its contests? A member of the CAC
> > actually used cost a couple of years ago as a reason for not splitting
> > off Assisted from Multi-Single.  Fortunately, that "logic" finally
> > failed, but as a supporter of ARRL for the last 60 years, I have to ask
> > when they will quit wasting money like this?
> >
> > --
> >
> > 73, Pete N4ZR
> > Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
> > http://reversebeacon.net,
> > blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
> > For spots, please go to your favorite
> > ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>