CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Boom for Bose Headset

To: k9yc@arrl.net, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Boom for Bose Headset
From: alannottage--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Reply-to: alannottage@aol.com
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 11:44:28 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
To: cq-contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 2:17
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Boom for Bose Headset


>For these reasons, it's important to... 
>2) Use settings in your rig to get rid of as much low frequency
>content as you can. The lows burn TX power, but make no contribution to speech
>intelligibility. I set up my K3 TXEQ for max cut of the three lowest 
>octave bands (50, 100, 200 Hz) and 4-6 dB cut of the 400 Hz band. When I 
>ran FT1000MPs, I set the audio bandwidth for 400-2,600 Hz.
>IMO, ALL mics and radios should kill those lower three octaves, and what 
>is needed for the 400 Hz band and on the high end will depend on the 
>voice and the mic.
Oh, sweet music, Jim.  That you have said this, folks may take note.  A lot of 
'runners' already have, of course, but a lot of S+P audio i.e from 'callers' is 
getting woeful.  The 
less operator Qs, the worse it is.  You can hear this in the frequency of 
'repeat' requests these days, CQWW especially - ARRL, somewhat less so.
>From the earliest days of SSB, the hams at Shure 
>designed a mic with an HF peak around 3 kHz to compensate the rolloff of 
>the SSB filter, and most ham mics do that to some degree. 
Alas, DID.  
>When I used a pro mic with my radios, I had to add that peak with EQ.  
There's still time to make those adjustments in time for the weekend, folks!
Many thanks, Jim.
Al G0XBV
 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>