CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW CW 2014 Results

To: "'Jeff Clarke'" <ku8e@bellsouth.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW CW 2014 Results
From: VK4TS Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 3 May 2015 07:48:40 +1000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Like you Jeff I would be interested in the techniques as they sure have taken 
the MS to a whole new level - 

There is a very good description on the 4o3a website at 
http://4o3a.com/index.php/4o3a-station/stories/cqww-2014-cw

Certainly the team from CN2AA are doing amazing things in the MM category. 






-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jeff 
Clarke
Sent: Sunday, 3 May 2015 2:52 AM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQWW CW 2014 Results

It's interesting to me that with the band change limitations that you have in 
M/S that the top score in that category is higher than the top M2X score. Even 
the 2nd place M/S score is close to the top M2X score of CR3L.

Some people might wonder how this is possible?  Are the operators at those 
stations so much better that they can make as many QSO's and multipliers than 
another station that has an additional full-time transmitter?

It's obvious to me these M/S  entries are using some type of lockout and have 
multiple stations on their CQ band and maybe on other bands when they can do 
one of their QSY's. In a sense these entries are really doing M/M but are not 
classified in that category because they have lockouts which allow them to 
transmit one signal at a time. Truthfully I really don't think is what CQ 
envisioned the multi-single category to be.

I have a  feeling that many of the stations being DQed are for multiple signals 
on a band or multiple bands because their lockouts ( or they don't have one) 
aren't working like they should.

CQ should count a station to be on a band when they are listening on that band. 
Not when they are only transmitting. I wish they would look into changing the 
rules to disallow this practice. I bet that would eliminate some of the DQ's.

Congrats again to the CR3L team. They have a dynasty in the M2X category. We 
have been chasing them for 5 years from PJ4A and just can't seem to get over 
the hump.

Jeff KU8E
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>