CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] CQWW Log checking

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Log checking
From: <dave@n1ix.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 08:38:44 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
All this discussion about NIL QSO's causes me to wonder.  Since the NIL QSO
may be the fault of either station why isn't the QSO just removed from the
log without penalty.

I understand the penalty if the call or exchange is copied incorrectly.
Although, there is also the issue of "bad senders" using bugs or straight
keys.

 

Dave N1IX 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [CQ-Contest] CQWW Log checking, dave <=