CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Leveling the playing field

To: n2ic@arrl.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Leveling the playing field
From: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 15:05:31 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Having a contest grow doesn't make it winnable.  Since sweeps is a work once in 
a contest event, the event favors west and south central stations that can work 
the hams who get on 15 and 10 only and are unworkable from the east coast 
unless you are ground wave or have a sporadic e opening.

73 Rich NN3W

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 10, 2015, at 4:29 PM, Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 11/10/2015 11:38 AM, Ed Sawyer wrote:
> 
> 
>> Oh and by the way, SS in the US is very unfair to North East US stations.
>> It should have inverse mileage based scoring actually to level the playing
>> field.  But there is negative growth in that contest so why beat a dead
>> horse.
> 
> Sorry, but your statement does not match the facts. Phone SS participation 
> has been growing. CW SS participation is stable. If guys like you would 
> actually operate SS, instead of grousing about it being "very unfair to North 
> East US stations" it would grow even more. You don't hear me grousing about 
> CQWW being unfair from here in southwest New Mexico, do you ? I just keep 
> plugging away, and sometimes do pretty well.
> 
> 73,
> Steve, N2IC
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>