CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] K9YC, WRTC, deep pockets

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] K9YC, WRTC, deep pockets
From: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:11:47 +0200
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I have the feeling that the Balkan region is suggesting that the way to go
with self-regulation is to have 4KW+ amplifiers as well as switches, filters
and combiners for that power level.

73
Peter, DJ7WW

-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Tonno Vahk
Sent: Samstag, 20. August 2016 20:24
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] K9YC, WRTC, deep pockets

What Ranko proposed was that the potential qualifiers will commit to letting
anybody into their station for inspection at any time during any qualifying
contest (ideally this should still be agreed and authorized by sponsors
beforehand). There are local contesters who are ready to do that without any
financial support from contest sponsors!

Sponsors would probably just need to set some standards as to what is
expected from the voluntary inspectors (e.g. recommended video and audio
recording with simple handheld camera/phone and documenting the RF path,
etc). As I understand there are many contesters in e.g. Balkan region who
are frustrated enough and ready to do that so we should give them chance to
enable the self-regulation of the contesting scene.


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>