CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Audio and Video Proof - a different "contest"

To: kr2q@optimum.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Audio and Video Proof - a different "contest"
From: Ed Muns <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 07:29:56 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Note that the log checking and award announcement took only 34 days.

73,
Ed W0YK
On Aug 30, 2016 3:26 AM, kr2q@optimum.net wrote:
>
> http://nyti.ms/2bZHdRY 
>
> What do you think?  Did he break the rules by running between "mults" instead 
> of "training?" 
>
> Looks like video proof (with a human witness) is good enough for Guinness! 
>
> Hope you enjoyed this lighter look at "contesting." 
>
> de Doug KR2Q 
> _______________________________________________ 
> CQ-Contest mailing list 
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com 
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>