To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] D1WW |
From: | "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net> |
Reply-to: | sawyered@earthlink.net |
Date: | Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:22:34 -0400 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Seems like the best solution all the way around is to change the skimmer code to just report what it hears. If you are going to start making "exceptions to the rule", you are just inviting trouble. Better to just report what you hear and let the receiver decide whether to act on it. It actually has nothing to do with what an individual contest sponsor wants to do with non DXCC valid callsigns. Each sponsor can and does decide that for themselves. Ed N1UR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Major Newspaper Article About WRTC and Contesting, John Unger |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Supporting theAmateur Radio Parity Act, James Cain |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] It's SALMON RUN time!!!!, Michael Dinkelman |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Supporting theAmateur Radio Parity Act, James Cain |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |