Nobody trust the call they get from a computer.
Why should anyone trust the frequency they get from the same computer?
Of course, the un-assisted do not have this problem in their operating.
The un-assisted are enjoying the real life instead of this kind of features
the computers, internet, simulations and what ever there is for the
assisted.
The assisted can never trust what they see.
Also they must rely on what they hear.
73,
Jukka OH6LI
2016-12-01 4:05 GMT+02:00 Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>:
> I'm a little perplexed. When the cluster spot says 14008.1, how often is
> the station really there, rather than at 14008.14 or 14008.06? How many of
> our radios are *that* well calibrated.
>
> Also, how far off zero-beat is enough? I find Iam almost always off
> zero-beat when I click on a station.
>
> 73, Pete N4ZR
> Download the new N1MM Logger+ at
> <http://N1MM.hamdocs.com>. Check
> out the Reverse Beacon Network at
> <http://reversebeacon.net>, now
> spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
> For spots, please use your favorite
> "retail" DX cluster.
>
> On 11/28/2016 10:01 PM, George K5KG via CQ-Contest wrote:
>
>> Calling DX stations dead zero beat on their QRG in a pileup is a no no,
>> yet it continues to happen. Please call up or down a few hundred HZ so
>> everyone can hear the DX station respond!
>>
>> 73, George, K5KG
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|