CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] DC in NAQP, WHY?

To: k9yc@arrl.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] DC in NAQP, WHY?
From: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:24:30 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
NN3RP and myself made a handful of QSOs. (I made 5 after I got home
from a trip before coax issues forced me to QRT).

73,

Paul, N8HM

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:
> I have exactly the same question. Modern cities are a terrible place to try
> to do ham radio. I don't know of a single contest station within the city of
> San Francisco; AB9H and WO9S operate one of two contests from the city of
> Chicago. I lived and operated from a mixed residential/industrial
> neighborhood in Chicago, and my station was more modest than that of W3DQ.
> DC was a multiplier in RTTY RU, and it appears that W3DQ was the only DC
> station on the air.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
>
> On Mon,1/9/2017 5:02 PM, Oliver Sweningsen wrote:
>>
>> There was a decision on including DC as a multiplier for NAQP.  At who's
>> suggestion and, who made the decision to alter the rules?
>>
>>
>> There are many who would like to know, just why the change was made.
>>
>>
>> Who will benefit?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>