I wonder if anyone has ever tried emailing him. I've never had any problems
working him (he's one of these guys who will call into any pileup), however,
I usually hit the dx cluster with a correct callsign but a lot of folks have
complained about him busting their calls. My guess is that he is using a
code reader and didn't realize his exchange wasn't correct.
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 2:07 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] TTT as an exchange
Thanks for the clarification, Ken.
After receiving RR, I asked for a repeat and he sent RR again. Wonder if his
sidetone was turned off...
On 2/21/2017 10:36, Kenneth Wolff wrote:
> PV8ADI sent "RR" for the first 76 contacts, then switched to KW. Maybe
> he had a configuration problem in his software or keyer? His log file
> 1000 as the sent power for all qsos. The file also lists RR as the
> state/province (in the header).
> This results a high percentage of busted exchanges *caused by PV8ADI*.
> A quick look at the PV8ADI reverse log (a listing of every qso
> claiming to work PV8ADI) shows when this happened. Most stations
> logged "RR." A few made up a number.
> PV8ADI is marked as a log with bad sent exchange info. No one will
> receive a busted exchange with PV8ADI.
> Ken - K1EA
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Mike Ritz <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Thanks, Kenneth. What about "RR"? Heard that one too.....
>> I think the organizers need to get together and set some kind of
>> standard on cut numbers for these tests. This is the first time I've
>> EVER heard TTT as an exchange
>> Thanks again!
>> *From: *"Kenneth Wolff" <email@example.com>
>> *To: *"Mike Ritz" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> *Sent: *Tuesday, February 21, 2017 8:12:11 AM
>> *Subject: *Re: [CQ-Contest] TTT as an exchange
>> 000 is an abbreviation for 1000.
>> The log checking software will accept a number of abbreviations;
>> 1000, 1K, KW, K, 000, TTT
>> - Ken K1EA
>> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Mike Ritz <email@example.com> wrote:
>>> I worked a guy last night (V43Z) on a couple of bands that was
>>> giving out "TTT" as a power level. I'm savy enough to know that this
>>> is "000", but do I really log this as "000"? He is running NO power?
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest mailing list
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest mailing list