PJ4G is exploiting the absence of this CQWW rule in the ARRL
General Contest Rules
"Alternating CQs on two or more frequencies on a band is not permitted"
That doesn't make it right for PJ4G to follow this practice that
is generally understood to be unacceptable behavior by all of the
rest of us.
What happens when most of the M/M, M/2, M/S and SO2R
stations mimic PJ4G's behavior? There will be no available
spectrum in the SSB contests for any single op stations to call CQ.
The CW bands will only have spectrum available for the
biggest gun single op stations. Is this where we want to go in the
future?
73
Frank
W3LPL
----- Original Message -----
From: donovanf@starpower.net
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Sent: Saturday, March 4, 2017 8:49:56 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Listen to something "interesting"
Steve,
Thanks for making that recording! A change in the general contest
rules is needed in order to prevent anyone else from the violating
the generally understood unacceptable practice of interleaving
CQs on two different frequencies on the same band...
73
Frank
W3LPL
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve London" <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
To: "cq Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 4, 2017 5:57:55 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Listen to something "interesting"
For those that missed it....
http://www.kkn.net/~n2ic/PJ4G.mp3
21345.4 on one audio channel, 21237.1 on the other audio channel.
73,
Steve, N2IC
On 03/04/2017 09:02 AM, Steve London wrote:
> Listen to 21345.4 and 21237.1 at the same time.
>
> Falls under the "what is not specifically prohibited is allowed" rule ?
>
> 73,
> Steve, N2IC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|