CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording

To: n2ic@arrl.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording
From: w5ov@w5ov.com
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:49:43 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Steve,

Can you cite one example of this occurring?  ("used as a weapon against
people they don't like")

On what do you base your allegation?

I think the phrase "put up or shut up" applies here.

73,

Bob W5OV


On Wed, April 19, 2017 8:19 am, Steve London wrote:
> On 04/18/2017 05:02 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
>
>> On Tue,4/18/2017 1:33 PM, Gerry Hull wrote:
>>
>>> I end up winning. Am I
>>> disqualified because we did not record?
>>
>> All of these scenarios defy logic. The CQ committee has the RIGHT to
>> request a recording. That doesn't mean that they WILL unless they suspect
>> that something is rotten in Denmark (not a slam on Denmark, simply
>> quoting Shakespeare. :)
>
> It can also be used as a weapon against people they don't like. "I don't
> like K9YC. He came in 3rd place, single-band 10, low power. Log looks
> clean. Let's see if he has a recording."
>
> 73,
> Steve, N2IC
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>