CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL 160M LCR Report

To: CQ Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>, Richard King <k5na@ecpi.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL 160M LCR Report
From: Jamie WW3S <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 15:46:55 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Grandma always said you'd go blind if you worked yourself....

On Jun 14, 2017 10:25 AM, Richard King <k5na@ecpi.com> wrote:
>
> I was looking over my Log Checking Report for the 2016 ARRL 160M Contest. I 
> came across this line in the callsign check results: 
>
> K5GA is incorrect.  Should be K5NA. 
>
>
> I am a bit mystified by this since the report is saying that I didn't work 
> K5GA, but instead actually worked myself (K5NA). 
>
> In all probability, K5GA is a unique. I have known Billy since he was 8 
> years old and it is likely that he got on and gave me a QSO. A few of the 
> locals will do that, quite unsolicited. 
>
> What is likely here is that we have uncovered a small problem in the log 
> checking program. You should never be told that you got a call wrong and 
> that you actually worked yourself. 
>
> A single line of additional code can probably keep this from happening 
> again. But it isn't really a big deal to me. 
>
> 73, Richard - K5NA 
> _______________________________________________ 
> CQ-Contest mailing list 
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com 
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>