To: | "'cq-contest@contesting.com'" <CQ-Contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R |
From: | "Henning" <mail@oz1bii.dk> |
Date: | Tue, 8 Aug 2017 22:11:15 +0200 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
To clarify: SO1R = Single Operator 1 Radio SO2R = Single Operator 2 Radioes Radio = Receiver AND Transmitter. Vy 73 de OZ1BII Henning ------------ - - - - - - --------------------------- -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] På vegne af Dave Edmonds Sendt: 8. august 2017 16:43 Til: cq-contest@contesting.com Emne: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R The top 25 players (according to 3830scores.com) in the NAQP CW contest were running SO2R. Congrats to N9NB a SO1R op who broke the chain of SO2R scores.. The concern I saw was that there were no SO1R stations anywhere near the top scores in the NAQP LP category. There was a very wide score margin between the two types of operation too... Is a category for number of receivers needed in the world of contesting? How are SO1R ops doing in other contests competing against SO2Rs? Does not having a "number of receivers" category discourage SO1Rs from competing? Are there any contests that have such a category? Thoughts? 73s Dave WN4AFP _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R, Jim Brown |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R, Dave Edmonds |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R, Alan M. Eshleman |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R, Trent Sampson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |