CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] It's time for an Assisted category in NAQP

To: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] It's time for an Assisted category in NAQP
From: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 09:38:52 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sounds more like the Multi rule needs changing to allow for single seat
multiple operator SO2R operation. Such operations are a great way to have
SO2R training sessions with developing contesters. Then one person can
choose to be a multi and work assisted if they wish.

73 jeff wk6i

On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 6:48 AM, N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net> wrote:

> Judging by the commentary recently on various reflectors (and my own
> experience last weekend), it is time for NAQP to institute an Assisted
> category, rather than lumping all one-transmitter assisted stations into
> Multi-2.  The M-2 class's band change rule makes zero sense for one
> transmitter assisted - I'll be losing credit for some QSOs because it never
> occurred to me that it would cover a single-transmitter competitor.
>
> ARRL 160 CW and ARRL 10M contests got rid of this anachronism a few years
> ago - it's time for NAQP to follow suit.  I don't know who decides such
> things, but trust that Chris will know who needs to take action.
>
> --
>
> 73, Pete N4ZR
> Check out the Reverse Beacon Network
> at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now
> spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
> For spots, please use your favorite
> "retail" DX cluster.
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>



-- 
Jeff Stai ~ wk6i.jeff@gmail.com
Twisted Oak Winery ~ http://www.twistedoak.com/
Facebook ~ http://www.facebook.com/twistedoak
RTTY op at W7RN
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>