CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 193, Issue 1

To: "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 193, Issue 1
From: Drew Vonada-Smith <drew@whisperingwoods.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2019 17:04:30 +0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Gents,

If I understand correctly, single band is the same as 2018.  You get the same 
credit, but you are competing against all band stations.  No advantage.

73,
Drew K3PA

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2019 12:19:27 +0000 (UTC)
From: <cqtestk4xs@aol.com>
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Rules for WRTC...oops
Message-ID: <1900728600.4667164.1546345167573@mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

A couple of things popped out at me.
If I read the rules correctly:
Single band entries count the same as all band entries...big problem.
Station VP5XYZ operates with a smallt station on a band from which there are 
usually not any single band efforts...160 or 10.? He operates for a couple of 
hours and winds up with 30 or 40 Qs.? VP5ABC does AB and makes 7000 Qs but 
finishes nr 2 for his area.? VP5XYZ gets more WRTC credit than the guy who 
busted butt for 40+ hours at VP5ABC.? This could happen in many of the 
qualifying areas.
In qualifying zones which are sparsely populated, what happens if no one gets 
25% of the top operator's score...no one goes from that district?

Bill KH7XS/K4XS



------------------------------
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 193, Issue 1, Drew Vonada-Smith <=