CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] [Contest] 2020 June VHF Contest

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] [Contest] 2020 June VHF Contest
From: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 19:18:42 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sure hope people don't opertae FT8 all weekend. When signals get over 0db please try CW/SSB. 6 meters has been open almost all day to the Caribbean, Central American and Northern South America from my QTH in Georgia. Also have been hearing signals from the back of my beam. Many have been loud enough to work on the traditional CW/SSB modes but no activity there.

Jeff

On 6/9/2020 05:23 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
On 6/9/2020 1:13 PM, Courtney Judd wrote:
have at it. I don't consider digi to be a real mode and see no reason why I should be asked to compete with it. This is my opinion and if you don't like it, hit delete and move on.

I use FT8 a lot on 160 for long haul DX that I can't work on CW, and on 6M for E-skip chasing grids, but I have so far not gotten excited about FT8/FT4 contesting. That said, I see little difference between the attitude expressed in this post and those who, in the '50s and '60s, refused to switch to that new-fangled SSB.

I also fail to see how FT8 differs from RTTY implemented by stations using, for example, N1MM or WriteLog with multiple decoder windows in which one simply clicks on a callsign to start an automated QSO and clicks on the report to enter it into the log.

Perhaps someone could explain the difference.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>