To: | reflector cq-contest <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Unique WPX callsigns worth it ? |
From: | David Hachadorian <k6ll.dave@gmail.com> |
Date: | Sun, 10 Mar 2024 12:18:41 -0700 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
I use KZ7X (RTTY/SSB) and WK7S (CW). I think they are both totally
unique mults. It's hard to quantify any increase in score, but I do
find that callers tend to stick around and try again if they don't get
through the first time.
Dave Hachadorian, K6LL Yuma, AZ On 3/10/2024 11:13 AM, Mike Smith VE9AA wrote: What are people thoughts on using a totally unique prefix in the 2 x CQWPX contests?Do you feel it increases your score any appreciable amount ? 5%? 10%Not being assisted very much I have very limited experience "clicking on spots" but I can at least imagine a scenario whereby S&Pers are only clicking on Mults and not also regular Q's who would not have a unique prefix...but how much, I have no idea.Thoughts?Mike VE9AAMike - Keswick Ridge, NB, Canada_______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Self spotting, Chris Tate - N6WM |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Unique WPX callsigns worth it ?, Jim Brown |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Unique WPX callsigns worth it ?, Mike Smith VE9AA |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Unique WPX callsigns worth it ?, Dave Edmonds |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |