CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW SO2B

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW SO2B
From: John R <n6hi.qrp@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 12:20:24 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Re: CQWW SO2B

WHY does QRP not get an UNASSISTED Category like the others?

Yet *another* contest that wants wants to lump ALL the QRPers into one
category.

This particular "level the playing field" idea, at best, only "levels"
things for folks who happen to have very good antennas for 2 bands. Another
batch of new categories that will only affect a very few top scorers.

This SO2B seems to me to be the latest hair-brained scheme to "level the
playing field" in contesting - something that simply cannot be done.

We all work contests with our own goals, and the new categories won't
really affect most of the operations at all, but the constant schemes to
"level the playing field" in contesting strike me as quite humorous.

As it is now one of the very most popular contests on the planet, it
appears that CQWW maybe doesn't need "fixing" or leveling?

-*73*-
John N6HI
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW SO2B, John R <=