"hard facts"
Just as I said.
For the record I used to debate you for years on this subject, both here
and in private discourse, and in spite of your comment below it was at
great length and with honest effort to be respectful. I used every
analogy I could think of, but I eventually gave it up as having no good
purpose.
Others here can make their own conclusions.
Respectfully,
Dave AB7E
On 1/10/2026 6:57 AM, Paul O'Kane wrote:
On 09/01/2026 22:13, Dave AB7E wrote:
I agree with most of that, but the problem with Paul is that he never
just expresses an opinion ... he ALWAYS puts forth everything on this
subject as an absolute statement of hard fact, and he does it at
every opportunity. It's pretty over the top.
But the problem with Dave is that he is wilfully blind to hard facts,
and he ignores opinions that don't correspond to his own. He would
rather disparage me than address the issues, and he does this at every
opportunity. It's pretty discouraging, but I'll keep trying.
For over ten years, Dave has yet to respond to any of the issues here
- https://ei5di.com/remote.html
He ALWAYS refuses to debate them. All he does is "disagree", but will
not say why. All in all, he's pretty disagreeable.
Of course, that's just my opinion :-)
73,
Paul EI5DI
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|