>Steve - I've had trouble with their support too. When I went to their
>booth in Dayton I was "greeted" by a surly LZ1, who, when I asked him
>if CT had a new update for Dayton like NA did, responded by saying
>"what's there to add, it already has everything", in a really snotty
>tone. Two of my friends were with me, both new contesters, and both
>of them went to K3LR's booth & bought NA.
>
>* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>* Alan Braun MD, NS0B/V31EV *Internet: albraun@socketis.net *
>* Jefferson City, MO *Packet: NS0B@N0LBA.#cemo.mo.usa.noam *
>* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>
>--
>Submissions: ct-user@ve7tcp.ampr.org
>Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@ve7tcp.ampr.org
>WWW: http://www.ve7tcp.ampr.org/Software/ct
>Questions: owner-ct-user@ve7tcp.ampr.org
Well, CT support mostly sucks, but there are plenty of people using it that
can help you, and it's far more speedy and somewhat more bug-free than NA.
It's also usually one step ahead of NA in PROPER implementation of major
features for power users and multi-ops: 50 line mode with movable windows,
fast efficient "super-check-partial", a very functional radio interface and
band map window, and several other minor details.
NA's selling point is CT-like operation for a lot of contests that CT doesnt
support.
73, Tyler KF3P
--
Submissions: ct-user@ve7tcp.ampr.org
Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@ve7tcp.ampr.org
WWW: http://www.ve7tcp.ampr.org/Software/ct
Questions: owner-ct-user@ve7tcp.ampr.org
|