At 07:52 PM 7/15/99 -0400, Robert S Morris wrote:
>All is well until I went to import into my logging program..
>About 800 errors in the BAND DATA..
>I used the B2R9 utility and according to the support
>guy for the logging program, the info is screwed up
>after it comes out of the B2R9 utility..
>That .exe is dated 2-1-99 with 37020 bytes.
>
>Contacts made on 6M came out on 20M..contacts made
>on 15 came out on 12M...
These are not errors - it is the way it's always been. CT uses a different
internal band-numbering scheme for FD which "appears" to confuse
B2R9. However, B2R9 and R2B9 complement each other, so the data *looks*
wrong, but R2B9 does the right thing with it.
If you're trying to use the .RES data to import into a logging program, you
should be using the CT to ADIF conversion utility instead.
73 - Jim AD1C
--
Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
http://jjr.ne.mediaone.net
--
Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com
Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com
WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ct/
Questions: owner-ct-user@contesting.com
|