The old one is handy if you want a human readable copy of the log.
73 de Philip, K4EP
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 11:36:49AM -0800, Mike Gilmer - N2MG wrote:
> Actually, the files are not all that similar. The "wrong" one has no summary
> info at the start.
> One is the old ARRL format (a somewhat predecessor to Cabrillo). Certainly it
> is no longer really needed. Generating it seems to only add to the confusion.
>
> How about a new command, CABRILLO, that generates <mycallsign>.CBR ?
>
> Mike N2MG
>
> On Sun, 09 December 2001, "N7MAL" wrote:
>
> >
> > Can someone explain, preferably AD1C or K1EA, why CT generates 2 similar
> > files, .LOG & .TXT ? It seems to my simple mind all this confusion about
> > which file to send could be eliminated if only one file were generated.
> > Perhaps Trey, N5KO, who fathered CABRILLO, could come up with a new,
> > dedicated, file extension .DUM. We would all know then all .DUM files go to
> > contest committees.
> >
> > (P.S. I forwarded a copy of this to my good friend N5KO)
> >
> > MAL N7MAL
> > BULLHEAD CITY, AZ
> > http://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htm
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ct-user mailing list
> > ct-user@contesting.com
> > ct-user-request@contesting.com Subject=unsubscribe to unsubscribe
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/ct-user
>
> ________________________________________________
> PeoplePC: It's for people. And it's just smart.
> http://www.peoplepc.com
> _______________________________________________
> ct-user mailing list
> ct-user@contesting.com
> ct-user-request@contesting.com Subject=unsubscribe to unsubscribe
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/ct-user
>
|