VY used to be equivalent to VE8 - perhaps that has something to do with it.
----- Original Message -----
From: "alsopb" <alsopb@gloryroad.net>
To: <ct-user@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 6:26 AM
Subject: Re: [ct-user] version scoring differences.
> I did some detective work on this. I was able to bring version 9.8
> and 9.51 into agreement.
>
> The problem was with the handling of VY2MGY/3. After putting in
> vy2mgy/3=ve3 into V9.8 (something I did in 9.5), the scoring was
> corrected to that of version 9.51.
>
> However, adding this line to version 9.6 did not correct version 9.6.
> For some reason, CT version 9.6 decided that this station was in zone
> 1 -- even though the bin file and other versions showed it was in zone
> 4 (what I manually entered during the contest). Don't ask me how it
> determined zone 1. I had no other zone 1 on 80 meters thus it appeared
> as an additional mult.
>
> 73 de Brian/K3KO
>
> alsopb wrote:
> >
> > Guys,
> >
> > Ran identical bin and cty files in three versions of CT. The scores
> > are all different.
> >
> > CT 9.80.006 999,362
> > CT 9.6.012 1,002,375
> > CT 9.51.001 1,000,350
> >
> > I haven't a clue which is right.
> >
> > Yes, I know the sponsors are going to score the results. However, it
> > does matter a bit for the PVRC internal awards which use claimed
> > scores.
> >
> > 73 de Brian/K3KO
> > _______________________________________________
> > CT-User mailing list
> > CT-User@contesting.com
> > CT-User-request@contesting.com Subject=unsubscribe to unsubscribe
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/ct-user
> _______________________________________________
> CT-User mailing list
> CT-User@contesting.com
> CT-User-request@contesting.com Subject=unsubscribe to unsubscribe
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/ct-user
|