CT-User
[Top] [All Lists]

[ct-user] FW: Does CT support M2 in WPX?

To: <ct-user@contesting.com>
Subject: [ct-user] FW: Does CT support M2 in WPX?
From: kwolff at charter.net (Ken Wolff)
Date: Thu Mar 6 10:22:10 2003
You can use two radios per computer with CT988 as it is with no trouble, if
you don't mind keeping track of the band changes yourself. I hope to have
that incorporated before the SSB WPX, but no guarantee.

- Ken



-----Original Message-----
From: ct-user-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:ct-user-bounces@contesting.com]
On Behalf Of kh6nd@lava.net
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 11:45 PM
To: PhilHSS@breathemail.net
Cc: ct user list
Subject: Re: [ct-user] FW: Does CT support M2 in WPX?

Phil,

I second the motion for support of M2 in the upcoming WPX. I am also
wondering if it would be possible to have one of the two stations set up
with two radios and an Array Solutions SO2R master. This would allow for
the operator at this position, with smart band change management, to
maximize 6 point QSO's when the going gets slow on the low bands. Would
it be possible to incorporate this without introducing a serial number
generation nightmare from the station with 2 radios?

Too much to ask with too little time left?

Ken??

Mike
KH6ND



Phil wrote:
> 
> Well, I've not heard from anyone on this aspect, so I am rather guessing
> that either I've got it all terribly wrong and the software does indeed
> perform correctly for M2 in WPX (in which case could someone please tell
me
> where I am going wrong!), else, CT needs an update but nobody has as yet
> requested it.
> 
> So, can I make a formal appeal for M2 to be supported by CT for WPX
please?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Phil
> G0HSS
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil [mailto:PhilHSS@Breathemail.net]
> Sent: 01 March 2003 09:15
> To: ct user list
> Subject: Does CT support M2 in WPX?
> 
> I've just spent some time getting my laptops ready for the WPX contest
later
> this month.
> 
> Both laptops are using CT version 9.87 and are setup to communicate via
> Ethernet to each other, and serial ports to the FT1000MPs and the packet
> TNC. All seems well, with Station 1 as RUN1 and Station 2 as RUN2.
> 
> However, I can't seem to get full functionality as regards serial numbers
on
> each station (I believe that the rules require each station to have it's
own
> sequential numbering) and the band change count per hour (I believe that
the
> rules specify a maximum number).
> 
> To my mind either I've set up something incorrectly, my brain has
remembered
> the rules incorrectly or CT does not support this section of WPX yet.
> 
> Can anyone advise please?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Phil
> G0HSS
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CT-User mailing list
> CT-User@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/ct-user
_______________________________________________
CT-User mailing list
CT-User@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/ct-user



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>