Thanks To:
Ed, Jim, Bob, and ALL others on the list for the help with my EST/DST change
over problem for CT DOS.
After being reminded about the existence of the "DOS SET TZ" variable I reset
it in my CT batch
file to "SET TZ=EST4EDT" to correct the CT time for GMT.
On April 1st I found that CT was again off by 1 hr which I expected !!!
After resetting my CT batch file to "SET TZ=EST5EDT" corrected the problem.
Guess I'll be watching CT DOS closely in the Fall unless I have changed over to
CT WIN by then.
I'm still not sure where CT gets its' time data from, CT, BIOS, or what.
Still working on why the "CT_TIME" utility not working, but that's for another
subject !!!
TNX to all !!!
73
Bob, K1VU
At 03:37 3/28/2007, R Johnson wrote:
>At 07:36 3/27/2007, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote:
>>At 11:48 PM 3/25/2007, R Johnson wrote:
>>
>>>After using CT DOS V10 for the CQ WPX contest I found all of my times were
>>>off by +1 Hour.
>>>I checked CT WIN and it was logging the correct time, just a problem with CT
>>>DOS.
>>
>>This is an interesting situation.
>
>Very interesting for the "Dark Ages" of the DOS OP System !!!
>
>>My understanding is that DOS gets time from the BIOS. I doubt any BIOS or
>>DOS have been patched with the new DST rules.
>
>After doing a little research, "DOS TIME" was based on GMT only, thus the need
>to include
>the Time Variable "SET TZ= EST?EDT" (or whatever your offset is/was) !!!
>
>>If your computer is set to local time, you probably have a TZ variable
>>defined somewhere:
>> setenv TZ=EST5EDT
>
>Yes it was !!!
>
>>I'll bet that doesn't work between March 11 and April 1 (the "traditional"
>>start of DST in the US).
>
>That's my guess also, I'm waiting to see how things play out !!! Obversely
>I'll be doubly
>checking CT's time vs GMT for the next few weeks !!!
>
>
>>My guess is that during the 3 earlier and (?) later weeks of DST, you will
>>need to change this to:
>>
>> setenv TZ=EST4EDT
>
>I did that after I was aware of the of the problem and it fixed it !!! Used
>EST4EDT !!!
>
>>Now what happens on the CQWW Phone weekend, where time traditionally changed,
>>is anyone's guess.
>
>Guess I'll have to watch for that TEST, but I usually conk out before the
>change over !!!
>
>>As Bob noted, CTWIN gets its time from Windows, and it is correct (I just
>>checked, my PC is set to
>>local time).
>
>Makes sense after thinking about how MICROSOFT handled time between DOS and
>WINDOWS>
>
>>I think you're best off setting your DOS PC to GMT and using CT with no TZ
>>variable.
>
>Nope, I can live with it the way I used CT for almost 20 years (Old GEEZER
>speaking) !!!
>
>>As to correcting existing logs, make sure you have the right "flavor" of
>>CT_TIME, there are
>>different versions for CT9 and CT10, and for running in an MS-DOS prompt
>>under Windows,
>>vs. running under real DOS.
>
>Hence the next problem to be addressed. Things don't seem to work wright with
>CT_TIME.
>
>I'll have to get back to you with the results of my tests !!!
>
>>73 - Jim AD1C
>
>73 Bob, K1VU
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>--
>>Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
>>USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.us
>
>_______________________________________________
>CT-User mailing list
>CT-User@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/ct-user
>CT on the web: http://www.k1ea.com/
_______________________________________________
CT-User mailing list
CT-User@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/ct-user
CT on the web: http://www.k1ea.com/
|