| To: | "wesley allison" <scgn@pipeline.com>, "Karlnet Mailing List" <karlnet@wispnotes.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: [Karlnet] quick antenna question |
| From: | "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net> |
| Reply-to: | Karlnet Mailing List <karlnet@WISPNotes.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Jul 2003 23:28:50 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:karlnet@WISPNotes.com> |
>I have a 2.4 GHz antenna that uses LMR400 cable, standard stuff, but can I use something else and what are the advantage and >disadvantage. depends on the cable - if it's thicker, it's probably more expensive, but there's less loss in 2.4 if it's thinner, it's probably cheaper and easier to play with, but 2.4 GHz loss increases >I was looking at some old thick net coax cable and I was wondering LMR400 is coax cable in a larger scale, so why can't I >same a little money on long runs and use a smaller coax cable for my antenna's? if it's 50 ohm coax, you shouldn't have a problem -Charles |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Karlnet] Flashrom Question, Brett Hays |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [Karlnet] quick antenna question, Charles Chia Sheng Wu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Karlnet] quick antenna question, wesley allison |
| Next by Thread: | [Karlnet] RG+ Password, travis-lists |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |