Karlnet
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Karlnet] Re: stats on prism/intersil 200mw cards

To: "'David Dietrich'" <david@countrysky.net>,"'Karlnet Mailing List'" <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Re: stats on prism/intersil 200mw cards
From: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
Reply-to: Karlnet Mailing List <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 13:13:27 -0400
List-post: <mailto:karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
I find the signal reported is accurate on v4.45 when doing a link test
from a lucent radio side (ie: ap1000 w/ lucent and rg1000 as cpe w/ smc)
signals are correct

Noise is not


> -----Original Message-----
> From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
[mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] On
> Behalf Of David Dietrich
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 12:18 PM
> To: Dan Metcalf
> Cc: 'Karlnet Mailing List'
> Subject: [Karlnet] Re: stats on prism/intersil 200mw cards
> 
> Hello Dan,
> 
> Wireless link test. The actual links have been great! I like to use
> the link test while fine tuning.  I've been using pings, tests back to
> my servers, etc. Works fine but takes longer to fine tune the antenna
> alignment.
> 
> Tuesday, August 10, 2004, 10:35:07 AM, you wrote:
> 
> DM> Wireless link or wireless link test?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> --
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> 



-- 
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>