Hey Quacks...that is whta you get for jumping the gun and trying to get an
unfair advantage on us little pistols! I think you should get a 1 hour
penalty....
I think your most productive hour would be just fine to be penalized with...
Hi! :,))).
73, Tom K5IID
At 22:18 04/01/02 +0100, Rex Maner wrote:
>OK Dave the first Q was logged at 23:59:59 and I also had to change the
>date to 04:30:2002 to get it to work correctly.
>Tnx Quack
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "k8cc" <k8cc@comcast.net>
>To: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>; "NA-USER" <na-user@contesting.com>
>Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 05:46
>Subject: Re: [NA-User] Breakdown/Rate
>
>
> > At 03:39 AM 4/1/02 +0100, Rex Maner wrote:
> > >I just finished the WPX test using NA10.55 and the rate sheet for the
>first
> > >24 hrs. shows no contacts ( these are shown for the second 24) and the
>last
> > >24 hrs is missing. I took the .qdf
> > >file to NA10.54 and have the same problem ???
> > >Rex aka WR7HE for Test
> >
> > Rex,
> >
> > Make sure your first QSO is not "early", and I mean exactly! NA starts
> > calculating the breakdown sheets from the first QSO, so if its off (say
> > starting at 23:59:59 it thinks that its the end of the second day.
> >
> >
> > Dave Pruett, K8CC
> > DATOM Engineering
> > datom@contesting.com
> > http://www.datomonline.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NA-User mailing list
> > NA-User@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/na-user
> >
>
>_______________________________________________
>NA-User mailing list
>NA-User@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/na-user
|