How about keeping separate numbers by band?
Hank K8DD
On 3/10/07, Robert Pack, NX5M <nx5m@txcyber.com> wrote:
>
> Those of you using NA, how have you set up for a multi-single with
> computers networked?
> How did you keep your serial numbers in order (other than maybe keeping
> qso numbers by band)?
>
> I do not think it is possible, or is it, to have a run station and a mult
> station and keep a set of numbers for the run station and a different set of
> numbers for the mult station.
>
> Last time I did a multi-single in WPX was back in 2002. At that time, I
> think we just kept consecutive serial/qso numbers. But doing that was a bit
> of a hassle because when a guy would work a mult on a band other than the
> "run" band, he would have to be sure that the "run op" did not give out the
> same qso number......or he had to alert the "run op" that he was giving the
> worked mult THIS number.
>
> The rules state that the mult station must use its own set of serial
> numbers. However, it is not written but understood that qso numbers by band
> are ok (by setting up NA as a multi-multi). It is really just a matter of
> submitting a log which accurately indicates the serial number that was sent.
>
> The last two multis in wpx here have been multi-multi where there are no
> issues (qso number by band).
>
> So what would you guys suggest? Consecutive or by band.
>
> Bob
> _______________________________________________
> NA-User mailing list
> NA-User@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/na-user
> NA on the web: http://www.datomonline.com/
>
--
'Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their
level then beat you with experience.' -anon
--
_______________________________________________
NA-User mailing list
NA-User@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/na-user
NA on the web: http://www.datomonline.com/
|