Propagation
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Propagation] Poor 160 Propagation at Solar Minimum

To: "'a COL Propagation'" <propagation@contesting.com>, "'a Propagation Forecast'" <kn4lf@hard-core-dx.com>, "'a DXLD eGroup'" <dxld@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Propagation] Poor 160 Propagation at Solar Minimum
From: "AD5VJ Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:33:06 -0600
List-post: <propagation@contesting.com">mailto:propagation@contesting.com>
This e-mail posting is from the Radio Propagation Reflector that you're 
currently subscribed to.  Refer to the end of this e-mail for directions on how 
to change your subscription options, or to unsubscribe.
_______________________-start-_________________

Great Bulletin thanks

Bob AD5VJ 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: propagation-bounces@contesting.com 
> [mailto:propagation-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of 
> Thomas Giella KN4LF
> Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2008 9:27 AM
> To: a COL Propagation; a Propagation Forecast; a DXLD eGroup
> Subject: [Propagation] Poor 160 Propagation at Solar Minimum
> 
> This e-mail posting is from the Radio Propagation Reflector 
> that you're currently subscribed to.  Refer to the end of 
> this e-mail for directions on how to change your subscription 
> options, or to unsubscribe.
> _______________________-start-_________________
> 
> Borrowed from Glenn Hauser's  DX LISTENING DIGEST 8-020, 
> February 15, 2008.
> 
> PROPAGATION
> +++++++++++
> 
> 160 METER MYTHS
> 
> Ed Swynar, VE3CUI, of Newcastle, Ontario, took issue with a 
> statement in last week's bulletin about the absence of 
> sunspots being great for 160 meters. "Such mythology could 
> not be further from the truth this year. The band has been 
> most unremarkable this season, to say the least, and it 
> continues to languish away in the doldrums. I thought that 
> perhaps it was something at fault at my end: however, many 
> subscribers to W4ZV's Topband Reflector seem to be of the 
> same opinion." Readers have sent similar reports about both 
> 160 and 75 meters over the past year. It seems that low 
> geomagnetic and sunspot activity should be good for the lower 
> frequencies, but perhaps it is not always the case.
> 
> 
> On my website KN4LF 160 Meter Radio Propagation Theory Notes: 
> http://www.kn4lf.com/kn4lf8.htm under:
> 
> 5.) Coronal Hole-
> 
> .....Coronal Holes occur most often on the downside of a 
> solar cycle and their absence at the bottom of a solar cycle 
> and at the beginning of the next, allow for the best medium 
> frequency radio propagation conditions. Many think it's the 
> lower solar flux values seen at the bottom of a solar cycle 
> that accounts for improved propagation conditions but it's 
> actually pretty much a lack of Coronal Holes and geomagnetic 
> storming. (See definition #11. 
> Geomagnetic/Ionospheric Storm).....
> 
> 3.) Equatorial Ring Current-
> .....A phenomena that acts as a repository for precipitated 
> electrons in the vicinity of the magnetic equator. The 
> electrons travel by spiraling around north south magnetic 
> field lines at a frequency called the 'gyro frequency. 
> The end result is lower latitude propagation path medium 
> frequency transmitted RF signal blockage and absorption via 
> the D layer. Absorption is similar to higher latitude Aurora 
> Oval absorption and is inter-related with same.....
> 
> 2.) Aurora Oval Blockage, Absorption And Refraction-
> 
> .....The aurora ovals "generally" have a negative impact on 
> medium frequency propagation. If the path over which you are 
> communicating lies along or inside one of the Aurora Ovals, 
> you will experience degraded propagation in one of several 
> forms; strong signal absorption, brief periods of strong 
> signal enhancement, which is mainly caused by tilts in the 
> ionosphere that allow signals to become focused at your 
> location or very erratic signal behavior in the form of 
> strong and rapid fading, etc., caused by a variety of effects 
> such as multi-pathing, anomalous and rapid variations in 
> absorption, non-great-circle propagation, horizontal or side 
> refraction and/or scatter (skewing) due to changes in 
> electron density and polarization changes. (See definition 
> #7. Propagation Path Skewing).....
> 
> 
> The bottom line is that propagation conditions will vastly 
> improve on the MF AM broadcast band, 160 and 120 meters on 
> the upside of solar cycle 24 in
> 2009 and 2010.
> 
> 
> 73,
> Thomas F. Giella, KN4LF
> Lakeland, FL, USA
> kn4lf@arrl.net
> 
> KN4LF Daily Solar Space Weather & Geomagnetic Data Archive: 
> http://www.kn4lf.com/kn4lf5.htm
> KN4LF Daily LF/MF/HF/6M Frequency Radiowave Propagation 
> Forecast & Archive
> Site: http://www.kn4lf.com/kn4lf6.htm
> KN4LF 160 Meter Radio Propagation Theory Notes: 
> http://www.kn4lf.com/kn4lf8.htm
> LF/MF/HF/VHF Frequency Radiowave Propagation Email Reflector: 
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/kn4lf 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Propagation mailing list
> Propagation@contesting.com
> 
> To change your subscription settings, or to unsubscribe, visit:
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/propagation
> 

_______________________________________________
Propagation mailing list
Propagation@contesting.com

To change your subscription settings, or to unsubscribe, visit:
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/propagation

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>