[Top] [All Lists]

[RFI] Apology

To: <rfi@contesting.com>
Subject: [RFI] Apology
From: bill thomas" <k1xt@hotmail.com (bill thomas)
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 08:38:03 -0500

>From: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
>Reply-To: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
>To: "'Pete Smith'" <n4zr@contesting.com>, rfi@contesting.com
>Subject: RE: [RFI] Apology
To: <rfi@contesting.com>
>Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 08:28:01 -0500
>No need Pete.  I checked some of the other links out, and they don't spec
>the freq at all.  Only a couple models gave any specs so some of them may 
>on Amateur freqs as the msg said.  Guess we'll hafta keep our eyes & ears 
>the lookout just in case.
>de ed -K0iL
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:       Pete Smith [SMTP:n4zr@contesting.com]
> > Sent:       Wednesday, 16 May, 2001 2:29 AM
> > To: rfi@contesting.com
> > Subject:    [RFI] Apology
> >
> >
> > The message I just posted may be in error.  I took the writer at his 
> > but afterward, when I followed the link he says is to a phone that
> > operates
> > in a US ham band, it turns out to specify a frequency pair of 249/375 
> > Many of the other ones don't say what frequency they operate on, but 
> > I've found specifies an amateur frequency.
> >
> > 73, Pete N4ZR
> > Contesting is!
> >

I checked the Cordlessmart site yesterday and it clearly had 146 listed for 
the base.  Honest to God.  I wish now I would have printed it out.  Now this 
morning it shows 375.  No doubt they got plenty of e-mails when all this was 
posted and probably changed it.  I really couldn't believe it, but it was 
clearly shown in the specs as 146 for the base.

Bill   K1XT
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/rfi
Submissions:              rfi@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  rfi-REQUEST@contesting.com
Questions:                owner-rfi@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>