>From: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
>Reply-To: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
>To: "'Pete Smith'" <n4zr@contesting.com>, rfi@contesting.com
>Subject: RE: [RFI] Apology
To: <rfi@contesting.com>
>Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 08:28:01 -0500
>
>
>No need Pete. I checked some of the other links out, and they don't spec
>the freq at all. Only a couple models gave any specs so some of them may
>be
>on Amateur freqs as the msg said. Guess we'll hafta keep our eyes & ears
>on
>the lookout just in case.
>
>73,
>de ed -K0iL
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Pete Smith [SMTP:n4zr@contesting.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 16 May, 2001 2:29 AM
> > To: rfi@contesting.com
> > Subject: [RFI] Apology
> >
> >
> > The message I just posted may be in error. I took the writer at his
>word,
> > but afterward, when I followed the link he says is to a phone that
> > operates
> > in a US ham band, it turns out to specify a frequency pair of 249/375
>MHz.
> > Many of the other ones don't say what frequency they operate on, but
>none
> > I've found specifies an amateur frequency.
> >
> > 73, Pete N4ZR
> > Contesting is!
> >
>
I checked the Cordlessmart site yesterday and it clearly had 146 listed for
the base. Honest to God. I wish now I would have printed it out. Now this
morning it shows 375. No doubt they got plenty of e-mails when all this was
posted and probably changed it. I really couldn't believe it, but it was
clearly shown in the specs as 146 for the base.
Bill K1XT
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/rfi
Submissions: rfi@contesting.com
Administrative requests: rfi-REQUEST@contesting.com
Questions: owner-rfi@contesting.com
|