To: | rfi@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RFI] Amateur transceiver must accept interference? |
From: | "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com> |
Reply-to: | richard@karlquist.com |
Date: | Fri, 23 Jul 2004 12:25:24 -0700 (PDT) |
List-post: | <mailto:rfi@contesting.com> |
Slightly OT: A logician (or lawyer) might ask the question: What if a part 15 device interferes with another part 15 device? Does the owner of the interfering device have to fix the interference? The law would seem to contradict itself. Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [RFI] Amateur transceiver must accept interference?, Tom Rauch |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [RFI] Amateur transceiver must accept interference?, Cortland Richmond |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFI] Amateur transceiver must accept interference?, Tom Rauch |
Next by Thread: | RE: [RFI] Amateur transceiver must accept interference?, Cortland Richmond |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |