RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] 160M/Modem problem

To: Rfi List <rfi@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RFI] 160M/Modem problem
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 09:11:50 -0800
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
On 12/19/2012 8:17 AM, Missouri Guy wrote:
CAT5, CAT6, and all variations thereof consists of four very good
twisted pairs, each twisted at a different rate to minimize
crosstalk
from one pair to another.
Hi Jim,  (This is off list because of a fork in the subject matter)  :D)

I can understand the need/use of twisted pair.  But,
are the pairs designed for different frequencies and/or different
impedences?....and that's why the different twist rates?

Good question. CAT5/6/7 has a nominal Zo of 100 ohms, and is designed for wide bandwidth (so that it can transport digital pulses that make up the Ethernet data). The twist rate does NOT affect the Zo, but making the twist rates DIFFERENT minimizes crosstalk between pairs, and that is quite important in Ethernet. It is equally important if that same cable might be used to carry multiple telephone conversations, or DSL circuits, or audio signals.

CAT5/6/7 is very good cable, and experience in the pro audio world have shown it to be as effective as shielded twisted pair in resisting the coupling of RF into problematic audio circuits.

It should be remembered that since the earliest days of telephony, the sole means of rejecting crosstalk between the telephone system and the 60 Hz power system that ran parallel to it for hundreds of miles was the twisting of the telephone pair. Thanks to the long wavelength of noise source was 60 Hz, twisting was effectively accomplished by crossing over at alternate support poles. With the advent of broadcasting and more broadband noise sources, twisted pair cables in balanced circuits became the standard means of noise rejection in audio systems, and shielding was added for microphone circuits.

In general, twisting is FAR more important (and effective) than the use of a cable shield in rejecting most forms of interference.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>