To: | rfi@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RFI] Are newer LG models still RF quiet??? - Washing Machine RFI revisited |
From: | Cortland Richmond <ka5s@earthlink.net> |
Reply-to: | ka5s@earthlink.net |
Date: | Tue, 24 Sep 2013 12:57:53 -0400 |
List-post: | <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com> |
You mean Part 15? You'd be right except...Part 15 is ineffectual because its limits are too high to preclude harmful interference below 30MHz (and some above), especially since interference now is much different than 50 or 60 years ago. Given the current legislative climate, however, asking for change would probably result in revoking Part 15 and throwing every complaint into the civil courts. Got money? Cortland KA5S On 9/24/2013 1237, Paul Christensen wrote: we *really* need an amended Part 95 to include unintentional radiation from appliances and all sub-assemblies used within an appliance. _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [RFI] Are newer LG models still RF quiet??? - Washing Machine RFI revisited, Paul Christensen |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RFI] Are newer LG models still RF quiet??? - Washing Machine RFI revisited, Paul Christensen |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFI] Are newer LG models still RF quiet??? - Washing Machine RFI revisited, Paul Christensen |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RFI] Are newer LG models still RF quiet??? - Washing Machine RFI revisited, Paul Christensen |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |