RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] Good news: Panasonic stops making plasma TVs

To: Donald Chester <k4kyv@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFI] Good news: Panasonic stops making plasma TVs
From: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 13:10:42 -0500
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
On 2013-11-14, at 1:07 PM, Donald Chester wrote:

> The bad news is that Panasonic is just one manufacturer, and there are 
> already millions of plasma TVs in service that are likely to continue spewing 
> out their garbage for years to come.
> 
> Those things are everywhere! Fortunately for me, I live out in the country 
> and don't have this problem, and a plasma TV will never enter these premises, 
> but many if not most hams I talk to, who live in a densely populated urban 
> area, tell me that plasma TV interference has made the lower HF bands 
> difficult or downright unusable. I wonder if this problem might not be far 
> more widespread than most people 
> think, and a major reason that activity on 160m and 75m has clearly dwindled 
> in recent years. 
> 
> This shouldn't even be an issue. This kind of interference is clearly a 
> violation of FCC rules and never should  have been allowed to get out of hand 
> to the extent that it has. RFI hash trashing up the bands could end up being 
> as much a threat to amateur radio as TVI was back in the 50s.
> 
> I don't understand why ARRL and the AM broadcast industry, along with other 
> HF users such as aviation and the military, haven't joined together to 
> sponsor an urgent research project to retrofit plasma TVs to eliminate the 
> RFI, and then once demonstrated that this would be feasible, exert pressure 
> on congress and the FCC to follow the law that already exists on the books, 
> and force manufacturers and existing users to clean those things up, just as 
> the FCC did with the guy who had the defective well pump motor. Amateur radio 
> probably couldn't accomplish this alone, but a combined effort with other 
> interests probably could pull it off. Remember, NTIA nixed a real 60m amateur 
> band because the government insisted that those HF channels were 
> strategically indispensable for national security. As with paranoia over the 
> health effects of rf, "national security" is another hot-button issue that 
> would likely resonate with politicians and the public.
> 
> Don k4kyv                                       




Hi Don,

It's all about the money, & nothing else---and at ALL levels, too...

~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>